Insolvency Law
4 August 2026
Interim Trustees and Court Stays Before Bankruptcy in Kenya
By Christopher N. Rosana

Before a bankruptcy order is made, the court may appoint an interim trustee to protect a debtor’s property and may restrict execution by creditors. These are urgent, court-controlled measures under the Insolvency Act, 2015. They are not automatic after a statutory demand or creditor application, and they do not give one creditor private control of the debtor’s estate.
The purpose is preservation. Where there is a real risk that property will disappear, perish or rapidly lose value before the bankruptcy application is decided, the court can appoint an authorised insolvency practitioner with defined powers. Once the required notice of appointment is published, creditors are generally prevented from starting or continuing execution unless the court permits it. The exact order, timing and publication record therefore matter.
When an interim trustee may be appointed
Section 36 applies after a creditor’s bankruptcy application has been made. The applicant creditor, or any other creditor of the debtor, may then ask the court to appoint an authorised insolvency practitioner as interim trustee over all or a specified part of the debtor’s property. The court may make that order at any time before a bankruptcy order is made.
The application should identify the property at risk and explain why ordinary restraint or later administration would be inadequate. Useful evidence may include title or registration records, asset schedules, valuation material, sale advertisements, account evidence, correspondence about a proposed transfer, stock records, photographs or evidence that goods are perishable or falling rapidly in value. General suspicion that a debtor may dispose of assets is not a substitute for evidence.
An interim trustee is not appointed simply because a creditor wants stronger collection leverage. The court is being asked to interfere with property before a bankruptcy order, so the relief should be proportionate to the genuine preservation risk. A debtor served with such an application should respond promptly with evidence about ownership, security, the asset’s condition, any proposed transaction and whether a less intrusive measure is available.
The court order defines the trustee’s powers
The court may authorise an interim trustee to take control of the debtor’s property, sell perishable property or property likely to fall rapidly in value, and control the debtor’s affairs or property as directed. The appointment and order should be read together. The trustee has the powers actually granted by the court, not a general licence to deal with every asset or business decision.
Where control of a debtor’s business is authorised, the statute limits the order to what the court considers necessary to conserve the debtor’s property. That safeguard matters for a sole trader or a person with a financial interest in a business. The appointment may affect books, stock, receivables, premises or operations, but it should not exceed the preservation purpose. An affected person should preserve records and cooperate lawfully while seeking clarification of any unclear direction.
The Official Receiver and authorised insolvency practitioners are suitably qualified for this appointment. A party asked to release property, information or money should verify the appointment order, the trustee’s identity, the scope of authority and the effective date. Keep a written record of every request, handover, inventory, payment and communication. Verification protects the estate as well as the person asked to cooperate.
Publication makes the appointment effective
Section 38 requires the interim trustee, as soon as practicable after appointment, to publish notice in one or more newspapers circulating in Kenya and in any other publication prescribed by the Insolvency Regulations. The appointment does not take effect until that publication requirement has been met. The notice is therefore a legal event, not a formality to be completed later.
The trustee should retain proof of publication, the date and publication used, and any prescribed notices. Creditors, the debtor, banks, employers, tenants, co-owners and counterparties should not assume that an informal notification or a copy of an unsigned document has the same effect as the completed statutory appointment. Where timing is disputed, obtain the official order and publication record before taking a material step.
Publication can create practical urgency. A party holding money or property should identify the legal basis on which it is held, preserve relevant records and seek advice before transferring value. A person who has a competing proprietary, secured or contractual claim should not assume the appointment eliminates that claim, but should raise it promptly with evidence rather than attempt a self-help remedy.
What happens to execution after publication
After notice of the interim trustee’s appointment is published, a creditor may not issue an execution process against the debtor under the relevant statutory route, and may not continue an execution process that was issued before publication. Section 39 makes an action taken in contravention of those restrictions void. The rule prevents a race by individual creditors while the court-supervised protective process is in place.
A creditor or another interested person may apply to the court for permission to issue or continue execution. The court can grant that relief on terms it considers appropriate. A creditor should not decide for itself that its security, judgment, urgency or commercial inconvenience creates an exception. The correct course is to identify the appointment and publication, preserve the execution documents, and seek directions or an order where continuation is said to be justified.
When execution is stayed under section 39, the Act applies specified bankruptcy provisions as though the stay order were a bankruptcy order. This reinforces the need to check the current statutory text and the precise order. It also means that a creditor, debtor or third party should not make assumptions based only on the word “stay”; the scope of the restriction and the consequences may depend on the legislation and the court’s terms.
Additional orders and practical next steps
After an interim trustee is appointed, section 37 allows the court to make further orders under section 36. An application may be made by a creditor, the interim trustee, or another person with the court’s approval. The application should state what additional control, sale authority or preservation measure is sought, why the existing order is insufficient and how the requested step remains proportionate.
For a creditor, the immediate tasks are to preserve the bankruptcy-application and debt records, disclose any security or execution position, stop prohibited enforcement, and provide focused evidence of the asset risk. For the debtor, the tasks are to preserve property and records, identify secured and third-party interests, respond truthfully to the order, and avoid transfers or conduct that could prejudice the estate. For third parties, the task is to verify authority and maintain a clear audit trail.
An interim appointment does not decide the bankruptcy application. The court must still determine the substantive application under the Act. Equally, a dismissed or withdrawn application may change the basis for the interim measures and execution restrictions. Prompt advice is essential where assets are perishable, a sale is imminent, a business is affected or another creditor claims priority.
Where the property includes a business, preserve payroll records, customer deposits, supplier contracts, inventory lists and tax information as well as physical assets. Those records may reveal third-party rights or liabilities that cannot be understood from a bank balance alone. The debtor should not delete accounts, cancel records or redirect business receipts without authority. The interim trustee should likewise distinguish property that belongs to the debtor from property held for another person before taking control or arranging a sale.
Primary sources: Insolvency Act, 2015, especially sections 36 to 40, and the current Insolvency Regulations. This is general information, not advice on an interim-trustee application or enforcement step.
Part 7 of 42 in this series.
